Student Acceptance of AI-Generated Feedback in Revising Argumentative Essays Among EFL Undergraduate Students

Zakaria Zakaria, Jumbuh Prabowo

Abstract


This study is about how students who are learning English as language use feedback from artificial intelligence when they edit essays that argue for something. The study also wants to find out what things affect how much these students use this feedback. The people who did the study used a way of doing things and they used a mix of numbers and talked to people to get their information. They worked with 30 students who are studying to teach English. These students had to write essays. Then edit them. The people who did the study looked at what the students changed in their essays. They also asked the students questions in surveys and in interviews. They used numbers to understand the information they got from the essays and the surveys. They used words to understand what the students said in the interviews. The students who are learning English as a language and the artificial intelligence feedback are very important to this study. The study is really about the English, as a foreign language student. How they use artificial intelligence feedback. According to the findings, most students were able to accept AI-generated feedback, especially when it came to language-related topics like grammar and vocabulary. The whole application category had the greatest uptake rate. On the other hand, adoption rates for argument development and idea organization were typically lower. Scores on the original and updated manuscripts increased significantly after utilizing statistical testing AI-generated feedback (p < 0.05). Additionally, although they still had trouble comprehending conceptual feedback, students' opinions of AI use tended to be favorable. These results suggest that while AI-generated feedback is useful in raising the caliber of EFL students' writing, especially in linguistic areas, it still has limitations when it comes to fostering the growth of argumentation abilities. To get the results using artificial intelligence in teaching people how to write should always have help from teachers. The use of intelligence in writing education needs to have teachers assisting with the learning process. This way the use of intelligence in writing education will be really helpful.


Keywords


AI-generated feedback; Uptake; Argumentative essay; EFL; Writing revision

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bitchener, J., & Ferris, D. R. (2012). Written corrective feedback in second language acquisition and writing. Routledge.

Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Ellis, R. (2009). A typology of written corrective feedback types. ELT Journal, 63(2), 97–107. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccn023

Han, Y., & Hyland, F. (2015). Exploring learner engagement with written corrective feedback. Journal of Second Language Writing, 30, 31–44

Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2019). Artificial intelligence in education: Promises and implications for teaching and learning. Center for Curriculum Redesign

Hyland, K. (2004). Disciplinary discourses: Social interactions in academic writing. University of Michigan Press.

Li, Z., Link, S., & Hegelheimer, V. (2023). Rethinking the role of automated writing evaluation in EFL writing: A meta-analysis. Language Learning & Technology, 27(1), 1–25.

Link, S., Dursun, A., Karakaya, K., & Hegelheimer, V. (2020). Noticing and uptake: The impact of automated writing evaluation on EFL learners’ writing. Language Learning & Technology, 24(3), 1–18.

Ranalli, J. (2018). Automated written corrective feedback: How well can students make use of it? Computer Assisted Language Learning, 31(7), 653–674.

Stevenson, M., & Phakiti, A. (2014). The effects of computer-generated feedback on the quality of writing. Language Learning & Technology, 18(2), 51–69.

Storch, N. (2010). Critical feedback on written corrective feedback research. International Journal of English Studies, 10(2), 29–46.

Warschauer, M., & Grimes, D. (2008). Automated writing assessment in the classroom. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 3(1), 22–36.

Wilson, J., & Roscoe, R. (2020). Automated writing evaluation and feedback: Multiple metrics of efficacy. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 58(1), 87–125.

Winstone, N. E., Nash, R. A., Parker, M., & Rowntree, J. (2017). Supporting learners’ agentic engagement with feedback: A systematic review. Educational Psychologist, 52(1), 17–37.

Xu, W., & Warschauer, M. (2022). Exploring the effects of automated feedback on student motivation and revision behavior. Journal of Second Language Writing, 56, 100879.

Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(39)




DOI: https://doi.org/10.53889/jpak.v4i1.887

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 28 times
PDF - 24 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2026 Zakaria Zakaria, Jumbuh Prabowo

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Creative Commons License

Jurnal Pendidikan Abad Ke-21 is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

Address: Perumahan Citra Gading Blok C5 No.14 RT 05/05 Kel. Cilaku, Kec. Curug, Kota Serang, Provinsi Banten, Indonesia, Post Code 42121