Engineering Design Process: A Review and Bibliometric Analysis

Ujang Sudrajat, Didit Ardianto, Irvan Permana

Abstract


Currently, science and technology is developing very quickly, so efforts are needed to balance this acceleration, especially in the world of education. Innovations in learning must always be done to keep pace with the development of science and technology. engineering design process (EDP) is one of the strategies available to implement STEM education, has been utilized by many STEM-related subjects educators as a mean to implement STEM (Hafiz and Ayop 2019). The engineering design process allows students to use mathematics and science inquiry to create and conduct experiments for potential design solutions.. The purpose of this paper is providing an extensive bibliometric literature review on engineering design process'. Articles obtained from the Google Scholar database using Publishing or Perish (PoP) software. There were 762 out of 999 articles found from Google Scholar data base ranging from 2016 to 2021 analyzed in this study. The chosen references were then managed using a referencing manager software namely Mendeley. In this research, VOSviewer software is used to classify and visualize the database that has been managed. Overall, this review provides an appropriate reference point for further research on engineering design process

Keywords


Bibliometric analysis; Engineering design; Engineering design process; STEM

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ahmi, A., Elbardan, H., & Ali, R. H. R. M. (2019, January). Bibliometric analysis of published literature on industry 4.0. In 2019 International Conference on Electronics, Information, and Communication (ICEIC) (pp. 1-6). IEEE.

Arık, M., & Topçu, M. S. (2020). Implementation of engineering design process in the K-12 science classrooms: Trends and issues. Research in Science Education, 1-23.

Baneyx, A. (2008). “Publish or Perish” as citation metrics used to analyze scientific output in the humanities: International case studies in economics, geography, social sciences, philosophy, and history. Archivum immunologiae et therapiae experimentalis, 56(6), 363-371.

Carr, R. L., Bennett IV, L. D., & Strobel, J. (2012). Engineering in the K‐12 STEM standards of the 50 US states: An analysis of presence and extent. Journal of Engineering Education, 101(3), 539-564.

Hafiz, N. R. M., & Ayop, S. K. (2019). Engineering Design Process in Stem Education: A Systematic. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 9(5).

Haik, Y., Sivaloganathan, S., & Shahin, T. M. (2010). Engineering design process. Cengage Learning.

Han, H. J., & Shim, K. C. (2019). Development of an engineering design process-based teaching and learning model for scientifically gifted students at the Science Education Institute for the Gifted in South Korea. Asia-Pacific Science Education, 5(1), 1-18.

Hudha, M. N., Hamidah, I., Permanasari, A., Abdullah, A. G., Rachman, I., & Matsumoto, T. (2020). Low Carbon Education: A Review and Bibliometric Analysis. European Journal of Educational Research, 9(1), 319-329.

Kelley, T. R., & Knowles, J. G. (2016). A conceptual framework for integrated STEM education. International Journal of STEM education, 3(1), 1-11.

Li, Z., Lu, J., Wang, G., Feng, L., Broo, D. G., & Kiritsis, D. A Bibliometric Analysis on Model-based Systems Engineering. In 2021 IEEE International Symposium on Systems Engineering (ISSE) (pp. 1-8). IEEE.

Long, N. T., Yen, N. T. H., & Van Hanh, N. (2020). The Role of Experiential Learning and Engineering Design Process in K-12 Stem Education. International Journal of Education and Practice, 8(4), 720-732.

National Research Council. (2009). Final report from the NRC Committee on the Review of the Louisiana Coastal Protection and Restoration (LACPR) Program. National Academies Press.

Sürmeli, H., Yıldırım, M., GÖCÜK, A., & SEVGİ, Y. (2018). secondary school students’ performance and opinions towards activities based on engineering design process. Cukurova University Faculty of Education Journal, 47(2), 844-872.

Winarno, N., Rusdiana, D., Samsudin, A., Susilowati, E., Ahmad, N. J., & AFİFAH, R. M. A. (2020). The steps of the Engineering Design Process (EDP) in science education: A systematic literature review. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 8(4), 1345-1360.

Yildiz, S., G., & Ozdemir, A. S. (2020). The effects of engineering design processes on spatial abilities of middle school students. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 30(1), 127-148.

Zheng, H., Liu, W., & Xiao, C. (2018). Structural relationship model for design defect and influencing factors in the concurrent design process. International Journal of Production Research, 56(14), 4897-4924.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.53889/ijses.v2i2.55

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 815 times
PDF - 951 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 Ujang Sudrajat, Didit Ardianto, Irvan Permana

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

 Creative Commons License

International Journal of STEM Education for Sustainability is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License