Exploring Research Trends in Science Education to be Implemented in the Elementary School
Abstract
Through an extensive bibliometric analysis, this study explored the ever-changing field of science education. In-depth analyses of publishing patterns, journal contributions, researcher output, institutional partnerships, and theme content and developmental paths in the field of scientific studies education are all included in the objectives. An exhaustive search of Scopus was used to gather research data from 2000 to 2023. Keywords including learning, science education, and elementary school were found in article titles, abstracts, and keywords. Research patterns were examined using Vos Viewer software, yielding important discoveries. The findings revealed that the highest number of research publications in the field of science education indexed in Scopus was observed in 2023, with 195 publications. Most international publications in this field were found in journal articles, with the United States being the leading contributor. The co-word analysis of the science education learning field identified eight clusters encompassing 88 themes associated with its development. These findings highlight the importance of interdisciplinary collaboration, focused investment in research areas, and the promotion of evidence-based approaches to improving educational outcomes in elementary schools. therefore, influence future research directions, policy formulation, and educational practices and advance knowledge in the field of science education.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Aguilar, D., & Turmo, M. (2019). Promoting social creativity in science education with digital technology to overcome inequalities: A scoping review. Frontiers in Psychology, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01474
Akerson, V., Carter, I., Pongsanon, K., & Nargund-Joshi, V. (2019). Teaching and learning nature of science in elementary classrooms. Science & Education, 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11191-019-00045-1
Alkhammash, R. (2023). Bibliometric, network, and thematic mapping analyses of metaphor and discourse in COVID-19 publications from 2020 to 2022. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1062943. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1062943
Bar-Ilan, J. (2021). Improving science instruction through research trend analysis. Journal of Science Education Policy, 15(2), 145-168.
Borgman, A. (2009). Trends in science studies learning research in elementary schools. Journal of Science Education, 35(2), 123-145.
Bornmann, L., & Mutz, R. (2015). Growth rates of modern science: A bibliometric analysis based on the number of publications and cited references. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66(11), 2215-2222.
Bybee, R. W. (2019). Using the BSCS 5E instructional model to introduce STEM disciplines. Science and Children, 56(6), 8-12.
Chen, C., & Song, M. (2019). Visualizing a field of research: A methodology of systematic scientometric reviews. PLoS ONE, 14(10), e0223994. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0223994
Chen, L., Pan, X., Chen, G., Yang, N., & Chen, C. (2021). A new bibliometric analysis technique using word clustering and metasynthesis methods: A case study of two open disciplines. Journal of Data and Information Science, 6(1), 87-108.
Chen, Y., Pan, Y., Hong, Z., Weng, X., & Lin, H. (2020). Exploring the pedagogical features of integrating essential competencies of scientific inquiry in classroom teaching. Research in Science & Technological Education, 38, 185-207. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2019.1601075
Cvitanović, C., Löf, M. F., Norström, A. V., & Reed, M. S. (2017). Building university-based boundary-spanning learning systems in sustainability science. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 19(4), 609-619.
Eyisi, D. (2016). The usefulness of qualitative and quantitative approaches and methods in researching problem-solving ability in science education curriculum. Journal of education and practice, 7(15), 91-100.
Darling-Hammond, L., Flook, L., Cook-Harvey, C., Barron, B., & Osher, D. (2020). Implications for educational practice of the science of learning and development. Applied Developmental Science, 24(2), 97-140. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2018.1537791
Fajari, L., Joharman, J., & Salimi, M. (2018). Application of natural environment approaches to improve science process skills in elementary school students. Social, Humanities, and Educational Studies (SHEs): Conference Series. https://doi.org/10.20961/shes.v1i1.23584
González-Brambila, C., Reyes-Gonzalez, L., Veloso, F., & Pérez-Angón, M. (2016). The scientific impact of developing nations. PLoS ONE, 11. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0151328
Herranen, J., & Aksela, M. (2019). Student-question-based inquiry in science education. Studies in Science Education, 55(1), 1-36. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2019.1658059
Ibragimov, G. I., Murkshtis, M., Zaitseva, N. A., Kosheleva, Y. P., Sadykova, A. R., & Shindryaeva, N. N. (2023). Research trends on learning environment in science education. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19(11), em2351. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13680
Jaffe, K. (2014). Social and natural sciences differ in their research strategies, adapted to work for different knowledge landscapes. PLoS ONE, 9(11), e113901. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0113901
Kim, S., Raza, M., & Seidman, E. (2019). Improving 21st-century teaching skills: The key to effective 21st-century learners. Research in Comparative and International Education, 14(1), 99-117. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745499919829214
Lederman, N.G., & Lederman, J.S. (2019). Teaching and learning nature of scientific knowledge: Is it déjà vu all over again? Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research, 1(6). https://doi.org/10.1186/s43031-019-0002-0
Lee, J., & Kim, S. (2018). Analysis of publication development and research trends in science studies learning. Science Education Research Journal, 42(3), 345-367.
Li, Q., Zhang, H., & Hong, X. (2019). Knowledge structure of technology licensing based on co-keywords network: A review and future directions. International Review of Economics & Finance. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2019.11.007
Lin, H., & Li, M. (2020). Bibliometric mapping and evolution of themes in science studies learning research. International Journal of Science Education, 46(5), 678-691.
Ma, X., Gryshova, I., Khaustova, V., Reshetnyak, O., Shcherbata, M., Bobrovnyk, D., & Khaustov, M. (2022). Assessment of the impact of scientific and technical activities on the economic growth of world countries. Sustainability, 14(21), 14350.
Madsen, D.Ø., Berg, T., & Di Nardo, M. (2023). Bibliometric trends in Industry 5.0 research: An updated overview. Applied System Innovation, 6(63). https://doi.org/10.3390/asi6040063
Meschede, C. (2020). The sustainable development goals in scientific literature: A bibliometric overview at the meta-level. Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12114461
Molnár, Z., Gyuris, Á., Radács, M., Nemes, P., Bátori, I., & Gálfi, M. (2023). Complex natural science and the challenges of its education in the 21st century. Cogent Education, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2240166
Murphy, C., Smith, G., & Broderick, N. (2021). A starting point: Provide children opportunities to engage with scientific inquiry and nature of science. Research in Science Education, 51, 1759-1793. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-019-9825-0
National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards. Retrieved from http://www.nextgenscience.org/
Öztürk, O., Kocaman, R., & Kanbach, D.K. (2024). How to design bibliometric research: An overview and a framework proposal. Review of Managerial Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-024-00738-0
Rodríguez, A., Nieto, M., & Santamaría, L. (2018). International collaboration and innovation in professional and technological knowledge-intensive services. Industry and Innovation, 25, 408-431. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2017.1414752
Ruiz-Primo, M. A., Li, M., Shavelson, R. J., & Solano-Flores, G. (2018). A call for validity research within psychometric undergirding of science formative assessment practices. Applied Measurement in Education, 31(1), 1-6.
Sellars, M., Fakirmohammad, R., Bui, L., Fishetti, J., Niyozov, S., Reynolds, R., Thapliyal, N., Liu-Smith, Y-L., & Ali, N. (2018). Conversations on critical thinking: Can critical thinking find its way forward as the skill set and mindset of the century? Education Sciences, 8(4), 205. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci8040205
Shekhar, P., Prince, M., Finelli, C., DeMonbrun, M., & Waters, C. (2019). Integrating quantitative and qualitative research methods to examine student resistance to active learning. European Journal of Engineering Education, 44, 18-36. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2018.1438988
Shema, H., Qiu, J., & Bar-Ilan, J. (2020). Analyzing clinical research trends through hybrid bibliometric-semantic methodology. Scientometrics, 124(2), 1311-1333.
Siuty, M., Leko, M., & Knackstedt, K. (2018). Unraveling the role of curriculum in teacher decision making. Teacher Education and Special Education, 41, 39-57. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888406416683230
Van Eck, N.J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523-538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3
Wang, Q., & Waltman, L. (2016). Large-scale analysis of the accuracy of the journal classification systems of Web of Science and Scopus. Journal of Informetrics, 10(2), 492-502.
Windschitl, M., Thompson, M., & Reiser, B. (2018). Research trends in science education from 2013 to 2017: A systematic content analysis of publications in selected journals. International Journal of Science Education, 40(1), 1-23.
Wu, X., & Wang, Y. (2019). Insights into the state and future of science education in primary schools. Primary Science Education Quarterly, 28(4), 567-589.
Zhang, J., Yuan, Y., Feng, L., Fu, Z., Tao, Y., & Xu, B. (2019). Mapping research themes by co-word analysis based on professional pre-knowledge. IEEE Access, 7, 41399-41410.
Zupic, I., & Čater, T. (2014). Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18, 429-472. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114562629
DOI: https://doi.org/10.53889/ijses.v4i2.399
Article Metrics
Abstract view : 115 timesPDF - 80 times
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2024 Ahmad Syachruroji, Suroso Mukti Leksono, Maman Fathurrohman, Rida Oktorida Khastini
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
International Journal of STEM Education for Sustainability is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License