Using Revised Bloom's Taxonomy to Evaluate the Cognitive Levels of Questions in Indonesian High School Physics Textbooks

Aprillia Aprillia, Riskan Qadar, Shelly Efwinda

Abstract


This study aimed to determine the cognitive level and dimensions of knowledge about the types of Lower Order Thinking Skills (LOTS), Middle Order Thinking Skills (MOTS), and Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) in class X high school physics textbooks on impulse & momentum based on bloom taxonomy revision. We used a descriptive approach with a quantitative approach. The subjects of this research were three high school physics textbooks for class X from three different publishers and data collection techniques using analysis sheets. The research results on the LOTS category of the three open books do not contain this question category. In the MOTS category, the analysis results included 1) C2-Conceptual 10% book publishers, 70% C3-Procedural, 2) C2-Conceptual book publishers 23.1%, C3-Procedural 46.2%, 3) book publishers 3 C2-Conceptual 55.7%, C3-Procedural 42.9%. In the HOTS category, the analysis results included 1) 20% for publisher 1 C4-Procedural, 2) 30.7% for publisher 2 C4-Procedural, and 3) 42.9% for publisher 3 C4-Procedural. Category questions C5 and C6 are separate from the three textbooks.


Keywords


Cognitive level; Physics textbook; Revised Bloom's taxonomy

Full Text:

PDF

References


Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohll, D. R. T. (2001). A taxonomy for learning and assesing : A revision of bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. Addisio Wesley Longman.

Effendi, R. (2015). Konsep Revisi Taksonomi Bloom dan Implementasinya Pada Pelajaran Matematika SMP. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika, 2.

Erniyanti, Junus, M., & Syam, M. (2020). Analisis Ranah Kognitif Soal Latihan Berdasarkan Taksonomi Bloom Revisi Pada Buku Fisika Kelas X ( Studi Pada Buku Karya Ni Ketut Lasmi ). 1(2), 115–123.

Giani, Zulkardi, & Hiltrimartin, C. (2015). Analisis Tingkat Kognitif Soal-Soal Buku Teks Matematika Kelas VII Berdasasrkan Taksonomi Blooom. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 66, 37–39.

Himmah, W. I. (2019). Analisis Soal Penilaian Akhir Semester Mata Pelajaran Matematika Berdasarkan Level Berpikir. 3(1), 55–63.

Jessen, K. R., & Mirsky, R. (2008). KKO Kognitif Revisi. Glia, 56(14), 1552-1556

Juhanda, A. (2015). Analisis Soal Jenjang Kognitif Taksonomi Bloom Revisi Pada Buku Sekolah Elektronika (BSE) Biologi SMA. Jurnal Pengajaran MIPA, 21(1), 61–66. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.18269/jpmipa.v21i1.657

Kemendikbud. (2019). Buku Penilaian Berorentasi Higher Order Thinking Skills. Direktorat Jenderal Guru dan Tenaga Kependidikan. Jakarta

Kurnia, F., & Fathurohman, A. (2014). Analisis bahan ajar fisika sma kelas xi di kecamatan indralaya utara berdasarkan kategori literasi sains. 1(1), 43–47.

Ministry of National Education. (2007). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Nasional No. 46 Tahun 2007 Tentang Penetapan Buku Teks Pelajaran yang Memenuhi Syarat Kelayakan untuk Digunakan dalam Proses Pembelajaran. Ministry of National Education.

National Education Association. (2012). Preparing 21st century students for a global society: An educator’s guide to the “Four Cs.” Alexandria, VA: National Education Association

Rukmini, E. (2008). Deskripsi Singkat Revisi Taksonomi Bloom. Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.

Sandi, M.I., Setiawan, A., & Rusnayati, H. (2013). Analisis buku ajar fisika SMA kelas x di kota Bandung berdasarkan komponen literasi sains. Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, 94–102.

OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 Results (volume I) : What Students Know and Can DO: Vol. I. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1787/5f07c754-en

Siswoyo, & Sunaryo. (2017). Analisis Soal dan Implementasinya dalam Pembelajaran Fisika di Sekolah Menengah Atas. Jurnal Penelitian & Pengembangan Pendidikan Fisika, 3(1), 171–175.

Susanti, N. Y., Trapsilasiwi, D., & Kurniati, D. (2015). Analisis Tingkat Kognitif Uji Kompetensi pada Buku Sekolah Elektronik (BSE) Matematika SMP/MTs Kelas VII Kurikulum 2013 Berdasarkan Taksonomi Bloom. Jurnal Matematika Kreatif- Inovatif. 6(1), 65-73

Sutrisno, F. H., Koes-h, S., & Supriana, E. (2018). Eksplorasi LOTS dan HOTS Materi Optik Geometri `Siswa SMA. Physics Education Journal, 2(1), 21–28.

Tajudin, N. M., & Chinnappan, M. (2016). The link between higher order thinking skills, representation and concepts in enhancing TIMSS tasks. International Journal of Instruction, 9(2), 199–214. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2016.9214a

Widana, I. W. (2017). Modul Penyusunan Soal Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS). Direktorat Pembinaan SMA, Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Dasar Dan Menengah Serta Departemen Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan.

Widodo, A. (2005). Taksonomi Tujuan Pembelajaran. Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, 4, 61–69.

Zaim, M. 2016. Evaluasi Pembelajaran Bahasa Inggris. Jakarta : Kencana




DOI: https://doi.org/10.53889/ijses.v3i1.93

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 300 times
PDF - 354 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 Aprillia Aprillia, Riskan Qadar, Shelly Efwinda

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

 Creative Commons License

International Journal of STEM Education for Sustainability is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License