Association of Consumer Behavior to a Circular Economy: Assessing a Variety of Perceptions and its Correlation in Germany

Widyasmoro Priatmojo

Abstract


Complexity in the circular economy concept enforced the integration of disciplines and a holistic approach to engender the implementation. A breakdown to bring a circular economy project to a level of market presumably provides the contribution toward the circular economy prospect. Problem identification is a deficiency in consumer behavior discovery. The objective of the research is to discover the characteristics through demographic analysis as well as to assess the association of attitude and perception toward the circular economy objective. The case is specified in Germany since it introduced effective waste management regarding a cyclical process. The conceptual framework is a model of factors influencing decision-making issued by the European Commission and a model of the Tri-component attitude. The data analysis method is quantitative by adopting a method of Cross tabulation with Chi-Square and Structural Equation Modeling. The findings demonstrated low demand for a circular economy market, price and quality are the highest indicators while buying a product, old adulthood and female respondents tended to put more concern on waste issues, and an increase in willingness to spend more in finance on eco-friendly products positively would rise the intention of engaging in the social and environmental context. This observation is relevant for SDGs objectives.


Keywords


consumer behavior; circular economy; sustainability

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bates, T., C., et al., 2021. Package “umx”. [Online] Available through [Accessed 11th April 2022]

Bollen, K. A., and Noble, M. D., 2011. Structural equation models and the quantification of behavior. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(Supplement 3), 15639-15646. [Online] Available through https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1010661108 [Accessed: 12th April 2022]

Byer, J. and Speerschneider, K., 2016. Package “likert“. [Online] Available through [Accessed 8th February 2022]

Cave, S., 2017. Recycling in Germany. [Online] Available through [Accessed 7th December 2021]

Center for theory of Change, n.d. What is Theory of Change?. [Online] Available through [Accessed 7th March 2022]

Delignette-Muller, M. and Dutang, C., 2022. Package “fitdistrplus”. [Online] Available through [Accessed 8th February 2022]

Duke, C., et al., 2018. Behavioural study on consumers’ engagement in the circular economy: final report, {CEU}. [Online] Available through [Accessed: 12th December 2021]

Dudovskiy, J., n.d. Consumer Buyer Behaviour Definition. [Online] Available through [Accessed: 11th April 2022]

Ekins, P., et al., 2019. The Circular Economy: What, Why, How and Where, In Background paper for an OECD/EC Workshop on (Vol. 5). [Online] Available through https://www.oecd.org/cfe/regionaldevelopment/Ekins-2019-Circular-Economy-What-Why-How-Where.pdf [Accessed: 9th December 2021]

Ellen Macarthur Foundation, n.d.. School of Thought: Circular Economy Schools of Thought. [Online] Available through [Accessed: 9th December 2021]

Elzinga, R., 2018. Consumer behaviour in a circular economy: Testing consumer willingness to participate in circular business models. Master Thesis, Utrecht University. [Online] Available through [Accessed 7th January 2021]

European Commission, 2014. Attitudes of Europeans towards waste management and resource efficiency, European Commission. [Online] Available through [Accessed: 29th September 2021]

European Commission, 2020. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions: A new Circular Economy Action Plan for a Cleaner and More Competitive Europe, European Commission. [Online] Available through [Accessed 7th January 2021]

Epskamp, S., 2022. Package “semPlot”. [Online] Available through [Accessed 4th April 2022]

Federal Ministry for The Environment, Nature Conservation, and Nuclear Safety and Consumer Protection, 2018. Waste Management in Germany 2018. [Online] Available through [Accessed 23rd December 2021]

Gandenberger, C., et al., 2014. The Impact of Policy Interactions on The Recycling of Plastic Packaging Waste in Germany, Working Paper Sustainability and Innovation No. S 08/2014. [Online] Available through [Accessed 9th November 2021]

Gaub, F., 2019. Global Trends to 2030: Challenges and Choices for Europe, ESPAS (European Strategy and Policy Analysis System). [Online] Available through [Accessed 9th January 2021]

Geert, R., n.d. SPSS Factor Analysis – Beginners. [Online] Available through [Accessed 11th April 2022]

Gray, A. 2017. Germany Recycles More Than Any Other Country, World Economic Forum, Article on Website. [Online] Available through [Accessed 5th January 2021]

Hammett, D., et al., 2014. Research and Fieldwork in Development, [e-book] Taylor & Francis Group. ProQuest Ebook Central. Available through [Accessed 1st January 2021]

Interpret of indices of CFA / SEM goodness of fit, n.d. [Online] Available through [Accessed 11th April 2022]

Khanal, J., 2018. Influence of affective, cognitive and behavioral intention on customer attitude towards coffee shops in Norway: Comparative study of local and international branded coffee shop. Master Thesis, Nord University. [Online] Available through [Accessed: 8th April 2022]

Kirchherr, J., Reike, D., Hekkert, M., 2017. Conceptualizing the Circular Economy: An Analysis of 114 Definitions, Journal of Resources, Conservation, and Recycling, 127 pp. 221.232. [Online] Available through [Accessed: 9th December 2021]

Korhonen, J., Honkasalo, A., Seppälä, J., 2018, Circular Economy: The concept and its limitations, Journal of ecological economics, 143 pp. 37-46. [e-journal] Available online through [Accessed: 12th December 2021]

Krieg, E., J., 2014. Statistics and Data Analysis for Social Science. [e-book] Pearson new internat. ed., 1. Harlow, Essex: Pearson Education. ISBN: 1-292-04123-4. Available through [Accessed: 28th January 2021]

Lishinski, A., 2021. Package “lavaanPlot”. [Online] Available through [Accessed 4th April 2022]

Neligan, A. 2016. Moving Towards a Circular Economy: Europe between ambitions and reality, IW Policy Paper No. 9/2016. [Online] Available through [Accessed: 9th December 2021]

Purvis, B., Mao, Y., and Robinson, D., 2019, Three pillars of sustainability: in search of conceptual origins. Sustain Sci 14, 681–695. [Online] Available through [Accessed 14th January 2021]

Reichel, A., de Schoenmakere, M., Gillabel, J., 2016. Circular Economy in Europe: Developing the Knowledge Base, European Environmental Agency (EEA) Report no 2/2016. [Online] Available through [Accessed 7th January 2021]

Rossmann, C., 1st ed., 2011. Theory of Planned Behavior. [e-book] Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG. doi.org/10.5771/9783845260341 [Accessed: 29th September 2021]

Rosseel Y., 2022. Package “lavaan”. [Online] Available through [Accessed: 11th April 2022]

Rückert-John, J., 2020. Identifizierung soziologischer Bestimmungsfaktoren der Abfallvermeidung und Konzipierung einer zielgruppenspezifischen Kommunikation. GESIS Datenarchiv, Köln. ZA6848 Datenfile Version 1.0.0, https://doi.org/10.4232/1.13653 [Accessed: 1st February 2022]

Schober, P., Boer, C., Schwarte, L., 2018. Correlation Coefficients: Appropriate Use and Interpretation. Anesthesia and Analgesia, (126)5, p. 1763-1768. [Online] Available through [Accessed 12th April 2022]

Seht, H. von and Ott, H. E., 2000. EU Environment Principles: Implementation in Germany, Wuppertal Institut für Klima, Umwelt, Energie Nr. 105. [Online] Available through [Accessed 5th January 2021]

Stahel and MacArthur, W.R., & MacArthur, E., 2019. The Circular Economy: A User’s Guide (, Ed.) (1st ed.). Routledge (e-book). Available through [Accessed 15th December 2022]

Statistics How To, n.d. Cronbach’s Alpha: Definition, Interpretation, SPSS. [Online] Available through [Accessed 14th March 2021]

Statistics How To, n.d., Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) Test for Sampling Adequacy. [Online] Available through [Accessed 11th April 2022]

United Nations Academic Impact (UNAI), n.d. Sustainability. [Online] Available through [Accessed 14th January 2021]

Vahdati, H., Mousavi, N., Tajik, Z. M., 2015. The Study of Consumer Perception on Corporate Social Responsibility towards Consumers Attitude and Purchase Behavior. Asian Economic and Financial Review, 5(5), pp. 831–845. [Online] Available through [Accessed: 29th September 2021]

Wickham, H., et al., 2022. Package “dplyr“. [Online] Available through [Accessed 8th February 2022]

Wickham, H., et al., 2022. Package “ggplot2“. [Online] Available through [Accessed 8th February 2022]

Wickham, H., et al., 2022. Package “Tidyverse“. [Online] Available through [Accessed 8th February 2022]

Wilts, H. et al., 2016. Benefits of Resource Efficiency in Germany, Wuppertal Institut für Klima, Umwelt, Energie GmbH. [Online] Available through [Accessed: 8th February 2022]

Yoshida, K., and Bohn, J., 2015. Package “Tableone”. [Online] Available through [Accessed 14th January 2021]




DOI: https://doi.org/10.53889/gmpics.v2.168

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 447 times
PDF - 260 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 Widyasmoro Priatmojo

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Flag Counter

View My Stats