The development of creative problem solving of grade 10 students using inquiry-based learning with creative problem solving processes

Jiraprapa Wola, Urit Charoen-In

Abstract


The science learning required to promote students’ thinking and problem-solving. This research focuses on enhancing the creative problem-solving abilities of Mathayomsuksa 4 students through the integration of inquiry-based learning (IBL) and creative problem-solving (CPS) processes. A group of 23 students from a secondary school in Thailand participated in the study. Research tools included lesson plans based on IBL and CPS methodologies, a creative problem-solving assessment, and a learning achievement test. Statistical analysis, employing measures such as mean, standard deviation, and percentage, was conducted to evaluate the outcomes. The findings indicate significant improvement in students' creative problem-solving abilities, with scores rising from 34.48% in the first cycle to 60.87% in the second cycle and to 86.96 in the final cycle. The results also highlight a steady increase in students' academic performance across the 3 cycles, suggesting that the combined use of IBL and CPS effectively supports students' intellectual growth and innovative thinking. These results demonstrate the potential of this integrated approach in fostering creativity and problem-solving skills, particularly in science-related subjects. To maximize the benefits of this educational strategy, it is crucial for teachers to gain a solid understanding of how to design and implement IBL and CPS based activities effectively. Such preparation will enable educators to create dynamic, student-centered learning environments that encourage exploration, critical thinking, and innovative solutions to complex problems.


Keywords


Action research; Creative problem-solving; Inquiry-based learning; Science teaching

Full Text:

PDF

References


Baer, J., & Garrett, T. (2010). Teaching for creativity in an era of content standards and accountability. Nurturing Creativity in the Classroom, 6-23.

Caswell, C. J., & LaBrie, D. J. (2017). Inquiry based learning from the learner’s point of view: A teacher candidate’s success story. Journal of Humanistic Mathematics, 7(2), 161-186.

Chen, P., & Chang, Y. C. (2021). Enhancing creative problem solving in postgraduate courses of education management using project-based learning. International Journal of Higher Education, 10(6), 11-21.

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Cropley, A. (2006). In praise of convergent thinking. Creativity Research Journal, 18(3), 391-404.

Duanphol, N., Nuangchalerm, P., & Safkolam, R. (2024). Implementing inquiry-based science learning on the topic world and its changing of grade 8 students. Journal of Education and Teacher Training Innovation, 2(2), 172-179.

Güven, I., & Alpaslan, B. (2022). Investigation of the effects of interdisciplinary science activities on 5th grade students' creative problem solving and 21st century skills. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 21(1), 80-96.

Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Duncan, R. G., & Chinn, C. A. (2007). Scaffolding and achievement in problem-based and inquiry learning: a response to Kirschner, Sweller, and. Educational Psychologist, 42(2), 99-107.

Inhelder, B., & Piaget, J. (2013). The growth of logical thinking: From childhood to adolescence. Routledge.

Jedaman, P., Sigma, S., Srichaiwong, P., & Kenaphoom, S. (2023). Paradigm shift of change management in the 21st century to sustainable educational organization. In Progress in Language, Literature and Education Research Vol. 2 Paradigm Shift of Change Management in the 21st Century to Sustainable Educational Organization, 134-151.

Kanphukiew, S., & Nuangchalerm, P. (2024). Enhancing scientific problem-solving and learning achievement of lower secondary students through active learning management. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 13(1), 172-181.

Kemmis, S., & McTaggart, R. (2000). Participatory action research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 567-605). SAGE Publications.

Kolodner, J. L., Camp, P. J., Crismond, D., Fasse, B., Gray, J., Holbrook, J., Puntambejar, S, & Ryan, M. (2003). Problem-based learning meets case-based reasoning in the middle-school science classroom: Putting learning by design (tm) into practice. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(4), 495-547.

Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2015). InterViews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.

Laisema, S., & Wannapiroon, P. (2014). Design of collaborative learning with creative problem-solving process learning activities in a ubiquitous learning environment to develop creative thinking skills. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 3921-3926.

Meyer, M. W., & Norman, D. (2020). Changing design education for the 21st century. She Ji: The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation, 6(1), 13-49.

OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 results: What students know and can do. OECD Publishing.

Office of the Education Council. (2018). National Education Plan 2017-2036. Thailand: Ministry of Education.

Osborn, A. F. (1963). Applied imagination: Principles and procedures of creative problem-solving. Scribner.

Parnes, S. J. (1967). Creative behavior guidebook. Charles Scribner’s Sons.

Pedaste, M., Mäeots, M., Siiman, L. A., De Jong, T., Van Riesen, S. A., Kamp, E. T., Manoli, C. C., Zacharia, Z. C., & Tsourlidaki, E. (2015). Phases of inquiry-based learning: Definitions and the inquiry cycle. Educational Research Review, 14, 47-61.

Plailek, T., Kitjarak, T., & Plailek, W. (2023). Improving creative problem-solving abilities of english students through hyflex learning management and project-based learning. Higher Education Studies, 13(4), 128-135.

Prince, M., Felder, R., & Brent, R. (2020). Active student engagement in online STEM classes: Approaches and recommendations. Advances in Engineering Education, 8(4), 1-25.

Puccio, G. J., Mance, M., & Murdock, M. C. (2010). Creative leadership: Skills that drive change. Sage Publications.

Puccio, G. J., Mance, M., & Switalski, L. B. (2011). Creativity rising: Creative thinking and creative problem solving in the 21st century. ICSC Press.

Quigley, C. F., & Herro, D. (2019). An educator's guide to STEAM: Engaging students using real-world problems. Teachers College Press.

Renzulli, J. S., Gentry, M., & Reis, S. M. (2021). Enrichment clusters: A practical plan for real-world, student-driven learning. Prufrock Press.

Setyosari, P., Kuswandi, D., & Ulfa, S. (2023). Creative problem solving process instructional design in the context of blended learning in higher education. Electronic Journal of E-Learning, 21(2), 80-97.

Sreejun, S., & Chatwattana, P. (2023). The imagineering learning model with inquiry-based learning via augmented reality to enhance creative products and digital empathy. Journal of Education and Learning, 12(2), 52-59.

Teseo, R. F. (2019). Analyses of attribute patterns of mathematical creative problem-solving ability in 6th grade students. St. John's University (New York).

There, H. W. G. (2010). 21st century skills: Why they matter, what they are, and how we get there. 21st century skills: Rethinking how students learn. Solution Tree Press.

Treffinger, D. J., & Isaksen, S. G. (2005). Creative problem solving: The history, development, and implications for gifted education and talent development. Gifted Child Quarterly, 49(4), 342-353.

Treffinger, D. J., Isaksen, S. G., & Stead-Dorval, K. B. (2013). Creative problem solving: An introduction. Prufrock Press.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (Vol. 86). Harvard Iniversity Press.

Wilson, H. E., Song, H., Johnson, J., Presley, L., & Olson, K. (2021). Effects of transdisciplinary STEAM lessons on student critical and creative thinking. The Journal of Educational Research, 114(5), 445-457.

Wu, H. K., & Hsieh, C. E. (2006). Developing sixth graders’ inquiry skills to construct explanations in inquiry‐based learning environments. International Journal of Science Education, 28(11), 1289-1313.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.53889/jgl.v5i1.605

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 12 times
PDF - 4 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2025 Jiraprapa Wola, Urit Charoen-In

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.