Higher Order Thinking Skills: Student Profile Using Two-Tier Multiple Choice Instrument
Abstract
This research aimed to analyze students' Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) using a two-tier multiple choice (TTMC) test instrument. This study used a descriptive quantitative method with a purposive sampling technique. The instruments used are multiple-choice tests with free reasoning, the TTMC test for quantitative data, interview guides, and learning observations for qualitative data. Anderson and Krathwohl's Bloom taxonomy revision (2001) cognitive instrument used to classify HOTS. The results showed that the higher-order thinking skill profile has an average score of 63,21 and dominated good. Students' cognitive level of analyzing/C4 (74,35%) is more dominant compared to cognitive evaluating/C5 (68,90%) and creating/C6 (63,24%). The hormonal regulatory subconcept gets the highest correct answer average with a percentage of 89,74%, and the contraceptive method subconcept gets the lowest correct answer average with 35,90%. One factor that influences the high and low percentage of the correct answer for each subconcept is the level of difficulty of the question; medium (enough) in the contraceptive method and too tricky in the contraceptive method. Analysis of answer patterns based on the results of a TTMC test shows that students are better able to answer questions on the first tier than answering on the second tier.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Aini, K., & Ridwan, M. (2021). Students' Higher Order Thinking Skills Through Integrating Learning Cycle 5e Management With Islamic Values in Elementary School. Al-Tanzim: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Islam, 05(03), 142-156. http://doi.org/10.33650/al-tanzim.v5i3.3042
Adodo, S. O. (2013). Effects of Two-Tier Multiple Choice Diagnostic Assessment Items on Students’ Learning Outcome in Basic Science Technology (BST). Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 2(2), 201-210. http://dx.doi.org/10.5901/ajis.2013.v2n2p201
Anazifa, R. D., & Djukri, D. (2017). Project-Based Learning and Problem-Based Learning: Are They Effective to Improve Student’s Thinking Skills?. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 6(2), 346-355. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v6i2.1110
Anderson, L.W. & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assesing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educatioanl Objectives. New York: Addison Wesley Longman.
Apino, E., & Retnawati, H. (2017). Developing instructional design to improve mathematical higher order thinking skills of students. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 812, 1–7. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/755/1/011001.
Bayrak, B. K. (2013). Using Two Tier Test to Identify Primary Student’s Conceptual Understanding and Alternative Conception in Acid Base. Mevlana International Journal of Education, 3(2), 19-26. http://dx.doi.org/10.13054/mije.13.21.3.2
Bhattacharya, D., & Mohalik, R. (2021). Factors Influencing Students' Higher Order Thinking Skills Development. Education India Journal : A Quarterly Refereed Journal of Dialogues on Education, 10(1), 349–361.
Brookhart, S. M. (2010). How to Assess Higher Order Thinking Skills in Your Classroom. Alexandria: ASCD.
Cullinane, A. (2011). Two-tier Multiple Choice Questions (MCQs) - How effective are they. International Journal of Science & Technology Education, 7(1), 611–624.
Fayakun, M. & Joko, P. (2015). Efektivitas Pembelajaran Fisika Menggunakan Model Kontekstual (CTL) dengan Metode Predict, Observe, Explain Terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Indonesia, 11(1), 49-58. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpfi.v11i1.4003
Frydenberg, M. E., & Andone, D. (2011). Learning for 21st Century Skills. IEEE’s International Conference on Information Society. 314–318. https://doi.org/10.1109/I-SOCIETY18435.2011.5978460
Lesmana, A. D. (2016). Identifikasi Profil Kemampuan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi Siswa SMA Menggunakan Instrumen Two-Tier Tes pada Mata Pelajaran Fisika, Skripsi UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta.
Mandernach, B. J., Forrest, K. D., Babutzke, J. L., & Manker, L. R. (2009). The role of instructor interactivity in promoting critical thinking in online and face-to-face classrooms. Merlot Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 5(1), 49-62. https://jolt.merlot.org/vol5no1/mandernach_0309.pdf
Mislia, T. S., Indartono, S., & Mallisa, V. (2019). Improving Critical Thinking among Junior High School Students through Assessment of Higher Level Thinking Skills. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 323, 326–333. https://doi.org/10.2991/icossce-icsmc-18.2019.58
Mukhtar, M. & Haniin, K. (2019). Modul Penyusunan Soal Keterampilan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi (Higher Order Thinking Skills). Jakarta: Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.
Nabilah., Andayani, Y., & Laksmiwati, D. (2014). Analisis Tingkat Pemahaman Konsep Siswa Kelas XI IPA SMAN 3 Mataram Menggunakan One Tier dan Two Tier Test Materi Kelarutan dan Hasil Kali Kelarutan. Jurnal Pijar MIPA, 8(2), 64-69. https://doi.org/10.29303/jpm.v8i2.8
Nofiana, M., Sajidan., & Puguh. (2016). Pengembangan Instrumen Evaluasi Higher Order Thinking Skills pada Materi Kingdom Plantae. Jurnal Pedagogi Hayati, 1(1), 46-53. https://doi.org/10.31629/ph.v1i1.37
Noma, L. D., Prayitno, A. B., & Suwarno. (2016). PBL untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi Siswa Kelas X SMA. Bioedukasi, 9(2), 62-66.
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2019). Country Note: Results from PISA 2018 (Indonesia). (https://www.eocd.org.edu/pisa).
Pratiwi, N. & Mustadi, A. (2021). Hots-Based Learning in 2013 Curriculum: Is it Suitable?. Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia, 10(1), 128-135. http://dx.doi.org/10.23887/jpi-undiksha.v10i1.22781
Rahayu, D., Sabar, N., Achmad, F., Laili, E. R., & Choiriyah, W. (2020). Pembentukan Karakter Siswa Berorientasi Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) di Sekolah Dasar. ELSE (Elementary School Education Journal), 4(1), 109–118. http://dx.doi.org/10.30651/else.v4i1.4071
Retnawati, H., Djidu, H., Kartianom, Apino, E., Anazifa, R. D. Teachers’ Knowledge About Higher-Order Thinking Skills And Its Learning Strategy. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 76(2), 215-230.
Saltan, F. & Divarci, O. F. (2017). Using blogs to improve elementary school students’ environmental literacy in science class. European Journal of Educational Research, 6(3), 347–355. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.6.3.347
Septiana, D., Zulfiani., & Noor, M. F. (2014). Identifikasi Miskonsepsi Siswa pada Konsep Archaebacteria dan Eubacteria Menggunakan Two-Tier Multiple Choice. EDUSAINS, VI(2), 190-200. https://doi.org/10.15408/es.v6i2.1151
Sesli, E., & Kara, Y. (2012). Development and application of a two-tier multiple-choice diagnostic test for high school students’ understanding of cell division and reproduction. Journal of Biological Education, 46(4), 214-225. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2012.688849
Shidiq, A. S., Masykuri, M., & Susanti, E. (2014). Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian Two-Tier Multiple Choice untuk Mengukur Keterampilan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi (Higher Order Thinking Skills) pada Materi Kelarutan dan Hasil Kali Kelarutan untuk Siswa SMA/MA Kelas XI. Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia (JPK), 3(4), 83-92.
Talanquer, V. (2006). Commonsense Chemistry: A Model for Understanding Students’ Alternative Conceptions. Journal of Chemical Education, 83. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ed083p811
TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center. (2015). TIMSS 2015 International Results in Science, Chapter I: Student Achievement. Boston: The TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston Collage. https://timss2015.org/download-center
Treagust, D. F. (2006). Diagnostic Assessment in Science as a Means to Improving Teaching, Learning, and Retention. UniServe Science Assessment Symposium Proceedings, 1-9.
Treagust, D. F. (1988). Development and Use of Diagnostic Test to Evaluate Student’s Misconception in Science. Journal of Science Education, 10(2), 159-169. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069880100204
Tsui, C.Y. & Treagust, D. (2010). Evaluating Secondary Students’ Scientific Reasoning in Genetics Using a Two-Tier Diagnostik Instrumen. International Journal of Science Education, 32(8), 1073-1098. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690902951429
Tuysuz, C. (2009). Development of Two Tier Diagnostic Instrument and Assess Students’ Understanding in Chemistry. Scientific Research and Essay, 4(6), 626-631.
Wahyuni. D. E. & Arief, A. (2015). Implementasi Pembelajaran Scientific Approach dengan Soal Higher Order Thinking Skill pada Materi Alat-alat Optik Kelas X di SMA Nahdlatul Ulama’ 1 Gresik. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Fisika (JIPF), 4(3), 32-37. https://doi.org/10.26740/ipf.v4n3.p%25p
Wartono, W., Hudha, M. N., & Batlolona, J. R. (2018). How Are The Physics Critical Thinking Skills of The Students Taught by Using InquiryDiscovery Through Empirical and Theorethical Overview?. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(2), 691-697. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/80632
Widana, I. W. (2017). Higher Order Thinking Skills Assessment (Hots). Jisae: Journal of Indonesian Student Assesment and Evaluation, 3(1), 32–44. https://doi.org/10.21009/jisae.031.04
Yuniarti, N. N., Susanto, & Irvan, M. (2018). The Implementation of Scientific Approach with Project Based Learning Model to Improve Students’ Analytical Skill and Responds. International Journal of Advanced Engineering Research and Science, 5(10), 90-93. https://dx.doi.org/10.22161/ijaers.5.10.11
Zulfiani., Yunistika R., & Juanengsih, N. (2018). Enhancing Students’ Higher-Order Thinking Skills Through Guided and Free Inquiry-Based Learning. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research “3rd International Conferences on Education in Muslim Society”, 115. https://dx.doi.org/10.2991/icems-17.2018.6
Zulfiani., Herlanti, Y., & Nurrachman, L. (2015). Development of a Higher-Order Thinking Instrument for Use with X Grade Senior High School Students. Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Science, Mathematics, Engineering and Technology Education, 427-433.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.53889/ijses.v3i1.79
Article Metrics
Abstract view : 476 timesPDF - 240 times
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2023 Indri Andriyatno, Zulfiani Zulfiani, Yuke Mardiati
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
International Journal of STEM Education for Sustainability is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License