Considerations for the Safety Analysis of AI-Enable Systems

Christopher W Green

Abstract


This study explored the applicability of hazard analysis techniques to Artificial Intelligence/Machine Learning AI-enabled systems, a growing area of concern in safety-critical domains. The study evaluates 127 hazard analysis techniques described in the System Safety Society’s System Safety Analysis Handbook (1997) for their relevance to the unique challenges posed by AI-enabled systems. A qualitative criteria-based assessment framework was employed to systematically analyze each technique against key AI-specific considerations, including complexity management, human-AI interaction, dynamic and adaptive behavior, software-centric focus, probabilistic and uncertainty handling, and iterative development compatibility. The evaluation process involved defining criteria to address AI/ML systems' distinctive characteristics, assessing each method's applicability, and ranking techniques based on their alignment with AI-related challenges. Findings indicate that Fault Tree Analysis (FTA) and Human Reliability Analysis (HRA) are highly relevant for performing safety on AI-enabled systems. Other techniques, such as What-If Analysis, require adaptation to address emergent behaviors. This study provides a framework for selecting and tailoring hazard analysis methods for AI-enabled systems, contributing to developing robust safety assurance practices in an increasingly intelligent and autonomous era.


Keywords


Systems Engineering; System Safety; Artificial Intelligence; Machine Learning; Hazard Analysis

Full Text:

PDF

References


Amodei, D., Olah, C., Steinhardt, J., Christiano, P., Schulman, J., & Mané, D. (2016). Concrete Problems In AI Safety. arXiv.org. https://arxiv.org/abs/1606.06565

Carter, H. G., Chan, A., Vinegar, C., & Rupert, J. (2022). Proposing The Use Of Hazard Analysis For Machine Learning Data Sets. Journal of System Safety, 58(2). https://doi.org/10.56094/jss.v58i2.253

Cummings, M. L. (2024). A Taxonomy For AI Hazard Analysis. Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making, 18(4), 327–332. https://doi.org/10.1177/15553434231224096

Dobbe, R. (2022). System Safety And Artificial Intelligence. In FAccT '22: Proceedings of the 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (p. 1584). https://doi.org/10.1145/3531146.3533215

Department of Defense (DOD). (2012). MIL-STD-882E: Department Of Defense Standard Practice System Safety.

Ericson, C. A. (2005). Hazard Analysis Techniques For System Safety (2nd ed.). John Wiley & Sons.

Garvin, T., & Kimbleton, S. (2021). Artificial Intelligence As Ally In Hazard Analysis. In American Institute of Chemical Engineers 2020 Spring Meeting and 16th Global Congress on Process Safety (August 16–20, 2020).

Johnson, B. (2022). Metacognition For Artificial Intelligence System Safety – An Approach To Safe And Desired Behavior. Safety Science, 151, 105743. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2022.105743

Martelaro, N., Smith, C. J., & Zilovic, T. (2022). Exploring Opportunities In Usable Hazard Analysis Processes For AI Engineering. arXiv preprint. https://arxiv.org/abs/2203.15628

Popović, V. M., & Vasić, B. (2008). Review Of Hazard Analysis Methods And Their Basic Characteristics. FME Transactions, 36(4).

System Safety Society. (1997). System Safety Analysis Handbook (2nd ed.).

Yampolskiy, R. V.. (2019). Artificial Intelligence Safety And Security. CRC Press/Taylor & Francis Group. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781351251389




DOI: https://doi.org/10.53889/citj.v3i2.670

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 12 times
PDF - 7 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2025 Cybersecurity and Innovative Technology Journal

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.