Love, Lies, and Control: A Cyberpsychological Analysis of Technology-Facilitated Abuse in Intimate Relationships

Tiphanie Gibbs

Abstract


Technology-facilitated abuse is a growing form of intimate partner violence where digital tools are used to control, monitor, and intimidate victims. This study aimed to examine how certain technologies—such as social media, GPS tracking, and messaging apps—are enabling perpetrators to exert coercive control over their victims. Findings showed that when abusers use these technologies, the nature of the resulting psychological and emotional harm is uniquely severe and impactful. Some of the study's victim participants described heightened levels of anxiety, depression, and PTSD as a direct result of their abusive partner using technology against them. The research also identified several troubling legal and ethical gaps in our current societal framework that leave victims vulnerable. Focusing on a blended demographic sample of study participants—across gender and age—it became clear that certain groups are being targeted more than others. The study concludes by applying a cyberpsychological framework to the issue under investigation and making urgent safety recommendations.


Keywords


Technology-Facilitated Abuse; Coercive Control; Cyberpsychology; Digital Surveillance; Intimate Partner Violence

Full Text:

PDF

References


Aiken, M., Donaldson, S., & Tinnelly, C. (2021). Pathways to Online Hate: Behavioural, Technical, Economic, Legal, Political & Ethical Analysis. https://repository.uel.ac.uk/item/8wzz3

Aiken, M., Farr, R., & Witschi, D. (2022). Cyberchondria, coronavirus, and cybercrime: A perfect storm. In Handbook of research on cyberchondria, health literacy, and the role of media in society's perception of medical information (pp. 16-34). IGI Global Scientific Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-8630-3.ch002

Alsoubai, A., Song, J., Razi, A., Naher, N., De Choudhury, M., & Wisniewski, P. J. (2022). From 'Friends with Benefits' to 'Sextortion:' A nuanced investigation of adolescents' online sexual risk experiences. Proceedings of the ACM on human-computer interaction, 6(CSCW2), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1145/3555136

Banks, J., & Andersson, C. (2023). The Role of Technology in Stalking and Coercive Control Among Young People. In: M. Mellins, R. Wheatley, C. Flowers (Eds.), Young People, Stalking Awareness and Domestic Abuse (pp. 121-140). Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-32379-9_6

Brown, C., & Hegarty, K. (2024). Fear and distress: How can we measure the impact of technology-facilitated abuse in relationships? Social Sciences, 13(1), 71. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci13010071

Davidson, J., Aiken, M., Gekoski, A., Netuveli, G., Farr, R., & Deac, A. (2024). Understanding Adolescent Criminal and Risky Online Sexual Behaviors in the Context of Mental Health and Well-Being: Findings from a Multi-National European Cybercrime Study. Victims & Offenders, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/15564886.2024.2408675

Grimani, A., Gavine, A., & Moncur, W. (2022). An Evidence Synthesis of Covert Online Strategies Regarding Intimate Partner Violence. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 23(2), 581–593. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838020957985

Harkin, D., & Merkel, R. (2023). Technology-Based Responses to Technology-Facilitated Domestic and Family Violence: An Overview of the Limits and Possibilities of Tech-Based "Solutions." Violence Against Women, 29(3-4), 648-670. https://doi.org/10.1177/10778012221088310

Huber, A. (2023). 'A shadow of me old self': The impact of image-based sexual abuse in a digital society. International Review of Victimology, 29(2), 199–216. https://doi.org/10.1177/02697580211063659

Leitão, R. (2019). Technology-Facilitated Intimate Partner Abuse: a qualitative analysis of data from online domestic abuse forums. Human–Computer Interaction, 36(3), 203–242. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370024.2019.1685883

Pentaraki, M., & Speake, J. (2024). Technology-facilitated abuse within the context of intimate partner violence: Barriers to and recommendations for safety planning. Human Geographies, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.5719/hgeo.2024.181.1

Phillips, K., Davidson, J. C., Farr, R. R., Burkhardt, C., Caneppele, S., & Aiken, M. P. (2022). Conceptualizing Cybercrime: Definitions, Typologies and Taxonomies. Forensic Sciences, 2(2), 379-398. https://doi.org/10.3390/forensicsci2020028

Rodríguez-deArriba, M. L., Santos, C., Cunha, O., Sánchez-Jiménez, V., & Caridade, S. (2024). Relationship between cyber and in-person dating abuse: A systematic review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 101943. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2024.101943

Rogers, M. M., Fisher, C., Ali, P., Allmark, P., & Fontes, L. (2023). Technology-Facilitated Abuse in Intimate Relationships: A Scoping Review. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 24(4), 2210–2226. https://doi.org/10.1177/15248380221090218

Woodlock, D., Salter, M., Dragiewicz, M., & Harris, B. (2023). "Living in the Darkness": Technology-Facilitated Coercive Control, Disenfranchised Grief, and Institutional Betrayal. Violence Against Women, 29(5), 987–1004. https://doi.org/10.1177/10778012221114920




DOI: https://doi.org/10.53889/citj.v3i1.649

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 43 times
PDF - 23 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2025 Cybersecurity and Innovative Technology Journal

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.