Forwarding strategies to online multiple-choice tests
Abstract
After the final test of the semester 2/2020 test results of the Aesthetic Appreciation courses (focus music content), learners did not score satisfactorily. The aesthetic Appreciation courses committee analyzed the problem together with the assessment results. This article is a study that compiles knowledge and ideas from academic documents and teaching experience in Aesthetic Appreciation courses, resulting in an article improving teaching using strategies do online multiple-choice tests as follows: 1) Ability to use a computer and typing skills. 2) Ability to read comprehension. 3) Ability to create multiple-choice, 4) Teaching as a tutor role, and 5) The online test, and points to be aware in online testing. In addition, the researcher will continue to apply this concept and create an online test in teaching. There are also ideas for teaching design. This research can be used for guideline in other courses in the future.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Aesthetic Appreciation committee. (2021). Minutes of the meeting prepared (TQF.5) for the course on Aesthetic Appreciation. Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Nakhon Pathom Rajabhat University.
Aesthetic Appreciation Course. (2021). Course Management 2500116 Aesthetic Appreciation for 1/2021(TQF.3). Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Nakhon Pathom Rajabhat University.
Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1991). Predicting the performance of measures in a confirmatory factor analysis with a pretest assessment of their substantive validities. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76(5), 732.
Anderson, L. W., Krathwohl, D. R., Airasian, P. W., Cruikshank, K. A., Mayer, R. E., Pintrich, P. R., & Wittrock, M. C. (2013). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives, Abridged Edition. Harlow: Pearson Education Limited.
Chapelle, C. A., & Douglas, D. (2006). Assessing language through computer technology. Ernst Klett Sprachen.
Clinton, G., & Hokanson, B. (2012). Creativity in the training and practice of instructional designers: The design/creativity loops model. Educational Technology Research and Development, 60(1), 111-130.
Danpradit, P., Suttamart, A., & Boonplian, P. (2021). The multiple-choice exams courses for educational measurement and evaluation. Journal of Education Mahasarakham University, 15(1), 84-101.
Everly, M. C. (2013). Are students’ impressions of improved learning through active learning methods reflected by improved test scores?. Nurse Education Today, 33(2), 148-151.
García J. Laborda, (2007). Introducing standardized ESL/EFL exams. Language Learning & Technology, 11(2), 3-9.
Goold, A., Coldwell, J., & Craig, A. (2010). An examination of the role of the e-tutor. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 26(5), 704-716.
Gutl, C., Lankmayr, K., Weinhofer, J., & Hofler, M. (2011). Enhanced automatic question creator--EAQC: Concept, development and evaluation of an automatic test item creation tool to foster modern e-education. Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 9(1), 23-38.
Johnson, C. (2020). A conceptual model for teaching music online. International Journal on Innovationsin Online Education, 4(2), 1-23.
Khunkaew, A. (2019). Evaluation and evaluation of the new study. 2nd ed. Chulalongkorn University Press.
Li, F. Y., Hwang, G. J., Chen, P. Y., & Lin, Y. J. (2021). Effects of a concept mapping-based two-tier test strategy on students’ digital game-based learning performances and behavioral patterns. Computers & Education, 173, 104293.
Little, J. L., Bjork, E. L., Bjork, R. A., & Angello, G. (2012). Multiple-choice tests exonerated, at least of some charges: Fostering test-induced learning and avoiding test-induced forgetting. Psychological Science, 23(11), 1337-1344.
Mekrat, S. (2012). Unit 7 reading in Gel 1001 Using Thai language. Office of General Education and Electronic Learning Innovation: Suan Sunandha Rajabhat University.
Nakhon Pathom Rajabhat University. (2021). Announcement: Schedule and teaching management model for the first semester of the academic year 2020. Retrieved from https://news.npru.ac.th/u_news/ detail.php?news_id=21004&ref_id=PR
Nguyen, N. (2020). Using the problem-based learning in STEM teaching about bamboo toothpick houses. International Education Studies, 13(12). 70-89.
Onnangyai, P. (2012). The construction of an analytical thinking ability test for exam takers Grade 6, Office of Education. Bangkok: Srinakharinwirot University.
Pichitrit, J. (2012). Principles of measurement and evaluation of studies. 7th ed. House of Kermist Co., Ltd.
Roberts, J. C., & Roberts, K. A. (2008). Deep reading, cost/benefit, and the construction of meaning: Enhancing reading comprehension and deep learning in sociology courses. Teaching Sociology (TS), 36(2), 125-140.
Siri Peng, B. (2018). Development of Thai reading and writing ability test to analyse learning disabilities for the person who takes the exam Elementary level affiliated with the office Phrae Primary Educational Service Area 2. Phrae Primary Educational Service Area 2: Phrae.
Tarrant, M., Ware, J., & Mohammed, A. M. (2009). An assessment of functioning and non-functioning distractors in multiple-choice questions: a descriptive analysis. BMC Medical Education, 9(1), 1-8.
Yates, A. (2011). Something old, something new: initial teacher education in the online mode. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Anne-Yates/publication/50874959_Something_Old_Something_ New_Initial_Teacher_Education_in_the_Online_Mode/links/54dd78dc0cf28a3d93f94fbd/Something-Old-Something-New-Initial-Teacher-Education-in-the-Online-Mode.pdf
DOI: https://doi.org/10.53889/jgl.v1i2.39
Article Metrics
Abstract view : 262 timesPDF - 409 times
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2021 Pramote Danpradit, Tanit Kongkumnerd, and Pranrapee Boonplian
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.