International practicum: What students gain and are challenged

Bao Kham

Abstract


The aim of the study is to explore the effectiveness of the international practicum designated for EFL Vietnamese students who majored in English language teaching and English Language programs. The overseas practicum is the result of the partnership between the University of Foreign Languages and its university partners in Thailand. Within the theoretical framework of  Kirkpartrick’s four-level training evaluation model, the study adopted the narrative approach to data collection and analysis, employing in-depth interviews. The study results indicate that the international practicum was effective across the four levels of the model. At the first level, the program effectiveness was manifested in the three aspects, active engagement, high relevance and student satisfaction; at level 2, its effectiveness was exhibited in terms of considerable degrees of knowledge, skills, attitude, confidence and commitment students gained; at level 3, the effective features were demonstrated in substantial extents of application and performance students made; and at the final level, the effectiveness was displayed in significant extents of various impacts the practicum had on the students after the practicum. The findings also show the different challenges students had to face in their oversea placements and also suggestions for improvements from preservice teachers and interns, and their supervisors as well as coordinators. The study findings also suggest noteworthy implications for sustainable practicum outcomes, especially for key stakeholders including students, university faculty and administration.


Keywords


coordinators; international practicum; interns; preservice teachers supervisors

Full Text:

PDF

References


Al-Malki, M., Weir, K. (2014). A comparative analysis between the assessment criteria used to asses graduating teachers at Rustaq College (Oman) and Griffith University (Australia) during the teaching practicum. Australian Journal of Teachers Education, 39(12), 28-42.

Altinay, F., Altinay, Z. (2012). An evaluation of school experience courses: the development of observation and reflection competencies of prospective teachers. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 55, 87-93.

Ateşkan, A. (2016). Pre-service teachers’ cultural and teaching experiences abroad. Journal of Education for Teaching, 42(2), 135-148.Brown, A., Ruiz, H. (2017). Equity and enrichment in the TESOL practicum. ELT Journal, 71(3), 284-294

Celen, K. M., Akcan, S. (2017). Evaluation of an ELT Practicum program from the perspectives of supervisors, student teachers and Graduates. Journal of Teacher Education and Educators, 6(3), 251-274.

Cushner, K. (2007). The role of experience in the making of internally-minded teachers. Teacher Education Quarterly, 31(4), 27-39.

Cushner, K. (2009). The role of study abroad in preparing globally responsible teachers. In R. Lewin (Ed.) The Handbook of Practice and Research in Study Abroad (pp. 173-191). New York: Routledge.

Dwyer, M. M. (2004). More is better: The impact of study abroad program duration. Frontiers: The Interdisciplinary Journal of Study Abroad, 10(1), 151-164.

Elayyan, S. R. (2017). 8P's Model: A theoretical framework to assess the pre-service teachers. Asian Academic Research journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 4(4), 34-45.

Gilliland, B. (2015). Benefits and Challenges of Supervising an International Practicum. CATESOL Journal, 27(2), 201-209.

Gunawan, J. (2016). Understanding culture in higher education in Thailand. Education for health (Abingdon, England), 29(2), 160-161.

Hamdan, M. H. (2017). Investigating the Saudi EFL trainee students’ satisfaction with the English practicum program. International Journal of English language and Linguistics Research, 5(1), 31-57.

Hatch, J.A. & Wisniewski, R. (1995). Life History and Narrative. London and Washington D.C.: The Falmer Press

Jin, A., Foley, A. & Cooley, D. (2020). Participant Chinese teacher and student perceptions of an international teaching practicum with Australian preservice teachers. Intercultural Education, 31(6), 607-622.

Kirkpatrick, J. D., & Kirkpatrick, W.K. (2016). Kirkpatrick's Four Levels of Training Evaluation. Alexandria, VA: ATD Press.

Marx, H., & Moss, D. M. (2011). Please mind the culture gap: Intercultural development during a teacher education study abroad program. Journal of Teacher Education, 62(1), 35-47.

Merc, A. (2015). Assessing the performance of EFL teaching practicum: Student teachers’ view. International Journal of Higher Education, 4(2), 44-56.

Nicholls, P., & Apiwattanakorn, P. (2015). Thailand: Where culture and the classroom collide. The New English Teacher, 9(1),1-14.

Quezada, R. L. (2004). Beyond educational tourism: Lessons learned while student teaching abroad. International Education Journal, 5(4), 458-465.

Robinson, D. B., & Foran, A. (2017). New Scotland to (old) Scotland: lessons learned from an international student teacher practicum. Scottish Educational Review, 49(2), 56-71.

Rorison, D. (2010). Assessment of the practicum in teacher education: advocating for the student teacher and questioning the gatekeepers. Educational Studies, 36(5), 505-519.

Saldana, J. (2016). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Sage.

Subedi, D. (2009). Assessing English language teaching student teachers on teaching practice. Journal of NELTA, 14(1-2), 138-145.

Syamsudarni & Sahraini (2018). An evaluation model of teaching practicum of pre-service EFL teachers at the Faculty of Education and Teacher Training in Higher Education. Arab World English Journal, 9(2), 352-363.

Tambyah, M. M. (2018). Intercultural understanding through a ‘similar but different’ international teaching practicum. Teaching Education, 30, 105-122.

Tome, A., Fitzsimmons, P., McKenzie, B. (2004). An investigation into the personal and professional experiences of pre-service teachers on a Fiji practicum. Paper presented at the AARE Annual Conference, Melbourne 2004.

Wikan, G., Klein, J. (2017). Can international practicum foster intercultural competence among teacher students? Journal of the European Teacher Education Network, 12, 95-104.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.53889/jgl.v2i1.104

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 352 times
PDF - 200 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 Bao Kham

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.